Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice ; : No Pagination Specified, 2022.
Article in English | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-1735196

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to (a) describe the process of rapid uptake of telemental health in an outpatient mental health clinic for veterans and their family members during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and (b) present patient and provider attitudes about telemental health. Virtual visit (video and phone) trends for this clinic are described over the 8 weeks pre- and post-COVID-19 closure. As part of a quality improvement initiative over a subsequent 2-week period, 147 patient visits (127 unique individuals), and 24 mental health providers who were part of a multidisciplinary team were eligible to complete an anonymous self-report satisfaction survey immediately after a telehealth session. Prior to the COVID-19 closure, the clinic averaged 112.75 completed visits per week, with virtual visits accounting for less than 5% of all appointments. In the second month after closure, the clinic averaged 153.75 completed visits per week (36.36% increase in volume), with virtual visits accounting for 100% of visits (42% phone, 58% video). The proportion of video compared to telephone visits increased pre to postclosure. The no-show rate significantly decreased pre to postclosure (10.87% vs. 15.01%, resp., chi2 = 17.81, p < .001). Patient and provider satisfaction with telemental health were high. Prospectively, most patients (83.56%) expressed preference for televisits-only or televisits combined with in-person visits. Patients and providers were satisfied with telemental health. Convenience was an oft-cited advantage by both patients and providers. Telemental health may represent a cost-effective solution to mental health care access during and beyond COVID-19. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Rapid and wide-spread uptake of telemental health in an outpatient clinic serving veterans and military service members was feasible and deemed satisfactory to patients and providers. Telemental health was associated with lower no-show rates. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

3.
PM&R ; 12(9):18, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-647024

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The global pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in an expansion of telemedicine. Measures of quality and barriers for rapid use by patients and physicians are not well described. OBJECTIVE: To describe results from a quality improvement initiative during a rapid adoptive phase of telemedicine during the pandemic. DESIGN: Patient and physician satisfaction with synchronous audiovisual telemedicine visits was measured during the early adoptive phase (6 April 2020-17 April 2020) within the division of sports medicine in an academic Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) department. Patients were invited to participate in a quality improvement initiative by completing an online survey at the end of a telemedicine visit. Physicians completed a separate survey. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient measures included visit type, duration of encounter, quality, and satisfaction. Physicians reported on experiences performed telemedicine. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 119 patients (293 telemedicine encounters, response rate 40.6%) and 14 physiatrists. Telemedicine was utilized primarily for follow-up visits (n = 74, 70.6%), and the most common duration was 15 to 29 minutes. Patients rated their telemedicine visit as "excellent" or "very good" across measures (91.6%-95.0%) including addressing concerns, communication, developing a treatment plan, convenience, and satisfaction. Value of completing a future telemedicine visit was measured at 84.9%. Most reported estimated travel time saved was in excess of 30 minutes. Rate of no-show was 2.7%. Most physicians (57.1%) had no prior experience with telemedicine visits, and most were comfortable performing these visits after completing 1 to 4 sessions (71%). Nearly all physicians (92.9%) rated their telemedicine experience as very good or excellent. The key barrier identified for telemedicine was technical issues. All physicians reported plans to perform telemedicine visits if reimbursement continues. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, rapid expansion of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic was well-received by a majority of patients and physicians. This suggests feasibility in rapid expansion of telemedicine for other outpatient sports medicine practices.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL